Regardless though, the i5 is clearly on shaky ground. This video breakdown of the strengths and weaknesses of Ryzen 5 and Core i5 effectively visualises why we reckon AMD has the better buy in the mainstream CPU market. However, the HEVC results place the Ryzens in-between the i5 and i7 - this is because the x265 encoder utilises AVX instructions heavily, an area of CPU design where Intel is much stronger. They reveal that AMD's much cheaper CPUs can power through h.264 encoding, beating the i5 effortlessly and marginally outperforming the 7700K. The benchmarks a little further down the page are based on our real-life workflow based on 4K processing with Handbrake, using the industry-leading x264 and x265 encoders. Here at Digital Foundry, we do a lot of video encoding. The extent to which that synthetic benchmark reflects on real-life performance in productivity apps will, of course, vary according to the application. The cheaper Rycan even beat the Core i7 7700K - even though the latter has a 1GHz advantage over the AMD offering. Cinebench confirms that Intel's Kaby Lake has a substantial single-thread advantage but on the multi-core benchmark, AMD's lead is overwhelming. However, despite Ryzen 5's massive advantage in terms of basic resources, Intel still has some fundamental advantages - but certainly in terms of productivity, there's no competition.
Ryzen 5 1600 cinebench full#
Both Ryand 1600X have six full cores and 12 threads, available for the same ballpark money as the i5's basic four cores and four threads. The rest of the review effectively writes itself then: what Ryzen 5 lacks in clocks, it makes up for with many more threads. Single-core performance is still important but the takeaway is that more processing cores and threads trump frequency, with the majority of modern game engines favouring more than four cores. Across the titles tested, the majority show a stock i7 outperforming an overclocked i5.
To understand why Ryzen 5 is so effective, check out this stock vs 4.8GHz overclock Core i5 7600K vs Core i7 7700K benchmark head-to-head. And to cut straight to the chase, given the choice between a 7600K or the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600, it's the AMD product we'd choose. But the return of AMD has already proven disruptive in other areas of the x86 market and the Ryand 1600X are simply irresistible products: Core i5 is no longer the 'go to' CPU line for gamers - there is now genuine, potent competition. The i5 is always fast out of the box and overclocking can keep your platform competitive for anything up to five or even six years. Since the release of the Core i5 2500K in January 2011, Intel's mainstream quad-core processor line has been the default choice for those looking to put together a capable gaming PC.
0 kommentar(er)
